Although the U.S. and England may seem so far apart, there
are more things that make them similar than you may think. Although horrible, most every country, past
and present, has had to deal with persecution or in-toleration of a group of
people at one point or another. Peoples’
differences, and their need to stop those differences can
sometimes get the best of them. After
all, we’re all only human, and we all have our own humanly desires and flaws. Throughout the beginning of U.S. history,
slavery is prominent, and so is people believing they’re superior or inferior
to others, just based on their skin color.
Throughout early English history, there is a common theme of religious and
political issues and differences causing violence and wars, particularly
between the Catholics and the Protestants.
So, throughout both countries’ early history, there is a sense of
differences being bad, and a need to settle or completely destroy those
differences altogether. The clash of
opinions sometimes cannot be settled through conversation and reasoning, and in
both of these cases, the result was a civil war: city versus city, brother
versus brother.
The Civil War in the United States started because people
began to question whether the idea of slavery, and judging others just based
off of their skin color, was really as correct as they had originally
thought. Most of the northern United
States was against slavery, and many abolitionists (people who worked to
abolish slavery and help to free slaves) lived there. However, in most of the southern U.S., people still
believed that slavery was acceptable, and they wanted it to stay. This clash of ideas over peoples’ differences
eventually became war in 1861, when seven southern states declared their
separation from the rest of the U.S. states, and developed the Confederate
States of America. This war lasted until
1865 (four years). The outcome was the
victory of the north, and the abolition of slavery, which was the right
outcome, paving a better path for our country's future. But, not all wars end with the "right" outcome.
The civil war in England was also between two different
groups, but didn’t have the outcome they planned on or wanted. The English Civil War started because the
English king, Charles I raised taxes, canceled Parliament’s meetings, and
refused to consult Parliament when making important countrywide decisions. So, Oliver Cromwell started to lead the
Roundheads (Puritan, merchant supporters of Parliament) in a battle against the
Cavaliers (noble supporters of the king).
The English Civil War began in August of 1642, and lasted for seven
years. Throughout this war, 4% of the
population died, which is even higher than the percent that died during World
War I, “The War to End All Wars.” At the
Battle of Naseby, Charles I was captured and brought to trial by Cromwell. He was found guilty, and sentenced to death,
executed on January 30, 1649. There was
an intense sadness throughout the people after Charles I was killed, and their
new military leader, Oliver Cromwell, wasn’t exactly what they thought he would
be. Cromwell ended the rule of
Parliament and ruled England with the support of his New Model Army. He banned all fun activities, and was not the
fair, just ruler even his own supporters thought he would be. Cromwell died in 1658 to the relief of his
people, and Charles II took the throne back.
Even though the two wars didn’t have the same outcome, or
even the same exact issues involved with them, they both share the same
underlying principle: intolerance.
Intolerance is what sparked both of these wars, whether towards each
other because of race, religion, or political standings. Although these two wars took place during different
time periods, on different continents, the message they communicate to us today is
still the same. We all are bound to have
differences and opinions about those differences, whether good or bad. We’re all human, and we were all created to
be different, and to let our differences define us, not limit us. We must work harder to accept others’
differences, and not let our prejudices get as bad as they did in these two
wars. We don’t want another war, more
danger, more death… we want a safe place for ourselves, our family, and our
friends to thrive. If we don’t learn
from the mistakes of the past, we are bound to have the same future…
Bibliography:
http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/caring/listing/battlefields/battle-of-naseby
http://www.pbs.org/civilwar/war/
Pictography:
http://www.soldierstudies.org/index.php?action=webquest_1
Hi Regan,
ReplyDeleteI thought your post was very good, and relatable for people who know about the civil war in America or England. You made a good connection between the American, and English civil wars over persecution or in-toleration, To improve this post you could make your paragraphs shorter to make it easier for your audience to read, otherwise your post was really good!
Regan,
ReplyDeleteI really enjoyed reading your blog post. I thought you made a lot of excellent points about how persecution is a theme which seems to occur in every country at some point, a topic which definitely needs to be addressed more often. Your word choice was professional and engaging, and your thoughts flowed very well. I especially liked the way you said " We’re all human, and we were all created to be different, and to let our differences define us, not limit us. We must work harder to accept others’ differences, and not let our prejudices get as bad as they did in these two wars." I feel like this really summarized your point very well. My only recommendation is to throw in a few quotes from primary sources that might further enhance your thesis, but overall, great writing!
-Travis
I loved your connections between the two civil wars! I l never realized how similar these wars are. It was very interesting reading your point of view between these wars because I agree completely. Like Meghan said, having smaller paragraphs would benefit your readers because it is a little overwhelming. Great job Reegs!!
ReplyDelete